Home

Local Links        

State Links

Directors

Programs

Staff

Minutes

Work Force

Early History

TMDL

DOT STIP 2005

Bike/Ped Plan

E 911

Schley DCA

Marion SolidWaste

Crisp SolidWaste

Marion Partial Update

Dooly Agenda

CEDS

 

I

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local Links

State Links

Directors

Staff

Minutes

Work Force

E 911

TMDL

DOT STIP 2005

Middle Flint Regional Development Center Logo

Crisp County Solid Waste Plan

   
Get Adobe Reader Document Available as a pdf file
   

DRAFT

Crisp County Solid Waste Management Plan

Arabi and Cordele

2008-2017

 

 

July, 2007

 

 

Crisp County Board of Commissioners

 

Ferrell Henry, Chairman

William Culpepper

Brad Faircloth

James Harris

Arthur James Nance

 

L. E. Crapse, County Administrator

 

 

 

 

 

Arabi City Council

 

Alan Raymond Douglas, Mayor

Walter Brown, Jr.

Ronnie Morgan

Larry Pate

Robert Southwell

 

Joyce Rooks, City Clerk

 

 

 

 

 

Cordele City Commission

 

Zack Wade, Chairman

Jeanie Bartee

Jimmy Black

Willie Colson, Jr.

A. J. Rivers

 

Mrs. Jean Burnette, City Manager

 

 

 

 

Assisted by

Middle Flint Regional Development Center

228 West Lamar Street

Americus, Georgia   31709

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

PLANNING AREA                                                                                                                    1

WASTE STREAM CHARACTERIZATION                                                                              4

LOCAL WASTE DATA                                                                                                            9

WASTE PROJECTIONS                                                                                                          10

WASTE REDUCTION                                                                                                             12

            INVENTORY                                                                                                              12        

ASSESSMENT                                                                                                             13

COLLECTION                                                                                                                         15

            CONTINGENCY STRATEGY                                                                                     16

ASSESSMENT                                                                                                             16

DISPOSAL                                                                                                                              17

CONTINGENCY STRATEGY                                                                                     18

            ASSESSMENT                                                                                                             20

LAND LIMITATIONS

            NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITATIONS

                        WATER SUPPLY WATERSHEDS                                                                  21

                        GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AREAS                                                         21

                        WETLANDS                                                                                                    21

                        RIVER CORRIDORS                                                                                      21

                        PROTECTED MOUNTAINS                                                                           21

            CRITERIA LIMITING SITING OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES

                        ZONING                                                                                                          24

                        FLOOD PLAINS                                                                                             24

                        WETLANDS                                                                                                    24

                        AIRPORT SAFETY                                                                                         24

                        MILITARY AIRSPACE                                                                                   24

FAULT AREAS                                                                                               26

                        SEISMIC IMPACT ZONES                                                                             26

                        UNSTABLE AREAS                                                                                       26

                        SIGNIFICANT GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AREAS                                26

            ASSESSMENT                                                                                                             28

EDUCATION AND PUBLIC INVOVLEMENT                                                                                  28

            ASSESSMENT                                                                                                             28

REQUIRED APPLICANT PROCEDURES RELATED TO LANDFILL SITING                                 29

            SITE SELECTION MEETING                                                                                      29

            SITE DECISION MEETING                                                                                        29

            ADDITIONAL STANDARDS                                                                                     29

HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT                                                                                               30

PLAN CONSISTENCY                                                                                                                       31

PERMITS FOR REGIONAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES                                               31

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY                                                                                          35

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS                                                                                      37

ATTACHMENT 1 – EMERGENCY COLLECTION ASSISTANCE                                         38

ATTACHMENTS 2 AND 3 – DISPOSAL CAPACITY ASSURANCE                                                40

ATTACHMENTS 4 AND 5 – COLLECTION CAPACITY ASSURANCE                                           41


 

INTRODUCTION

 

 

The Georgia Legislature has determined solid waste management planning by the state and local governments, and regional development centers is necessary to; (1) prevent environmental degradation, (2) manage resources, and (3) effectively reduce and manage solid waste.  To achieve that end, the 1990 session of the Georgia General Assembly passed the Georgia Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Act which stipulates that:

 

1.      in order to receive a permit, grant, or loan for a solid waste management facility, each city and county shall develop, or be included in, a comprehensive solid waste management plan,

2.      any request for a solid waste handling facility permit, or funding for publicly owned and operated solid waste facilities or equipment must be consistent with the solid waste management plan of all affected local governments.

 

The Act declares that it is the policy of the State of Georgia to educate and encourage generators and handlers of solid waste to reduce and, to the greatest extent possible, minimize the amount of solid waste through source reduction, reuse, composting, recycling, and other methods, and to promote markets for, and engage in, the purchase of goods made from recycled materials.

 

The Solid Waste Management Act requires each solid waste management plan to meet the following criteria:

 

1.      provide for assurance of adequate solid waste collection capability and disposal capacity within the planning area for at least ten years from the date of plan completion,

2.      have a program in effect to reduce by 25 percent the per capita rate of municipal solid waste disposed statewide in solid waste facilities as compared with the per capita municipal solid waste disposal rate in FY 1992,

3.      identify all solid waste handling facilities within the planing area as to size and type, and

4.      identify land areas unsuitable for solid waste handling facilities based on environmental and land use factors.

 

In addition, the Act requires each local government to report annually the progress in meeting statewide solid waste reduction goals, and the costs of solid waste management programs and services within their jurisdiction.  The information provided in this annual report must be reasonably consistent with that provided in the local government plan, and solid waste disposal and landfill capacity reports.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLANNING AREA

 

Crisp County is located in the southwest quadrant of the state; sixty miles south of Macon, forty miles northeast of Albany and ninety miles north of Valdosta.  Located in the Fall Line Hills of the Coastal Plain Province, the county’s highest elevation is 450’-500’ above mean sea level.     

 

Between 1950 and 2000, the community increased in population by 25% (4,333); the 1990s being the period of greatest growth.  Population increased by 10% (1,985) that decade, equivalent to 45% of the growth experienced during the entire last half of the century.  Throughout the five decades the seat of county government accounted for 50%-60% of all residents; 2% lived in Arabi.  The community does not experience significant fluctuations in seasonal population.

 

Population

Jurisdiction

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005*

Crisp

17,663

17,768

18,087

19,489

20,011

21,996

21,884

  Cordele

9,462

10,609

10,733

10,914

10,312**

11,608

11,493

  Arabi

376

303

305

376

433

456

450

  Unincorporated

7,825

6,856

7,049

8,199

9,257

9,932

9,941

Source:  U. S. Census 

*estimates of  U. S. Census          

**Exclusive of an apparent 1,031 person undercount contested by the City

 

Between 1980 and 2000, the number of households in the community increased 27% (1,778).  Although the number of households in Cordele increased (642), the proportion of households credited to Cordele decreased by four percentiles, (56%-52%); Arabi maintained an almost constant 2% share.

     

Households

Jurisdiction

1980

1990

2000

Crisp

6,559

7,287

8,337

  Cordele

3,661

3,832

4,303

  Arabi

133

149

185

  Unincorporated

2,765

3,306

3,849

Source:  U. S. Census

 

      Information presented in the following table reveals the mix of local employment opportunities by industrial sector. 

 

Industrial Mix 2005 – Crisp County

 

Industry

Number

of Firms

Employment

Weekly

Wage

          #                   %          

%

Goods-Producing

91

1,954

22.2

$569

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting

24

222

2.5

$423

Mining

1

*

*

*

Construction

34

405

4.6

$547